MPC Voices Concerns on School Funding, Smart Growth and State Revenue Proposals at House Budget Hearing - Metropolitan Planning Council

Skip to main content

MPC Voices Concerns on School Funding, Smart Growth and State Revenue Proposals at House Budget Hearing

Testimony delivered by MPC South Suburban Coordinator Kristi DeLaurentiis at Kankakee budget hearing

My name is Kristi DeLaurentiis. I am the south suburban coordinator for the Metropolitan Planning Council. I also serve on Governors State University ’s Board of Trustees, the Ill. Nature Preserves Commission, and the state’s Digital Divide Elimination Advisory Committee.

First, I’d like to thank House Speaker Madigan for calling for statewide Bipartisan Summits on State Finances and the Budget to hear from constituents. Thank you, Reps. Dugan, Gordon, and Cultra, and Sen. Halvorson, for giving me the opportunity to speak about the impact of the governor’s budget proposals and how they imperil the state’s long-term health.

As you’ve been hearing, the state’s current fees and taxes have created an economic climate that makes Illinois an expensive place to conduct business. Instead of spurring economic development, we are further “un-leveling” the playing field with neighboring states by continuing to increase business fees. We’ve also been impeding business growth through our failure to adequately fund our schools. As a state, Illinois already lags far behind in providing the funding needed to ensure that every child has a quality education. Currently, schools receive nearly $1000 less per pupil than recommended by the Education Funding Advisory Board in 2002.

Although lawmakers have invested new dollars into K-12 school funding, it’s barely keeping up with inflation. Even with the state’s per pupil guaranteed funding raised by $154 for FY 05, the increase amounted to a mere $2 over the cost of inflation for the year, based on the Consumer Price Index data issued by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Impact. In fact, even with additional dollars, last year alone, more than 3,400 teachers were laid off statewide so that school districts could reduce their spending. Here, in Kankakee, that means larger class sizes and fewer programs. School District 111 had to cut over $1M out of last year’s budget, while Herscher Community Unit School District 2 made over $467,000 worth of cuts, forcing both districts to freeze textbook purchases, staff hiring and development, and technology purchases, as well as eliminate many sports, music, and gifted programs.

Inadequate funding also impacts our higher education institutions. Governors State University, like every other public university in the state, has been impacted by cuts in funding. We cannot fix the problems in K-12 education without the qualified and certified teachers that the public universities graduate each year. Without the nurses, therapists, and administrators that we graduate each year, we cannot hope to improve our health care system. If we don’t adequately fund our education system, companies will find it harder and harder to compete in the global economy without educated men and women who are well prepared.

The governor’s proposed education-funding plan for FY06 “robs from Peter to pay Paul,” using surpluses of other dedicated funds. This unstable and unpredictable plan for school-funding is ill-conceived and not only fails to adequately fund our schools today, but also jeopardizes other programs.

Last year, the state was short-sighted in raiding the road fund to fill the budget hole, risking future projects. Our transportation network is at the heart of Illinois’ economic well-being, and is already stressed by the need for repairs to existing roadways, the need for new infrastructure, and the growing demand for public transportation. State leaders must identify funds to match federal programs, not jeopardize our transportation priorities because it funneled needed transportation funds elsewhere.

We are also poised to jeopardize our natural resources. Last year, the state cut programs and slashed funding throughout the Dept. of Natural Resources, coming close to eliminating open space and parkland funds, known as OSLAD (Open Space Land and Development) and NAAF (Natural Area Acquisition Funds). Local officials, mayors, park district directors, environmentalists, and hundreds of citizens spoke out about how this would impact their communities and were able to stop further cuts. Now, once again, the governor is proposing to remove any "surpluses" from these programs.

But these are not surplus funds. These are existing obligations to units of local government including park districts, forest preserves, and conservation districts. All of these agencies have gone through a competitive grant application process, have been awarded a grant, and have initiated projects in reliance on the award. If the state is not able to meet its obligations when a project has been completed, the ultimate result will be a tax increase on the local property taxpayer.

In Kankakee and elsewhere, the public has been left to protect watersheds, forests and recreation areas and to preserve some of the last remaining natural areas. Illinois ’ important conservation programs, for the benefit of future generations, must be restored. Just imagine if previous lawmakers had not valued the forests, rivers, and open spaces that are currently protected as part of the county’s beautiful park system. I know that during my tenure as a nature preserve commissioner, we’ve been able to preserve and acquire some of the highest quality lands left in the entire state-right here in Kankakee -- but that is all in peril with this proposed budget.

Other critical programs will be impacted by the so-called “sweeps.” And again, most of the existing dollars are already obligated or pledged for a specific purpose. An example of just one of those funds, the Eliminate the Digital Divide Fund, seeks to address the needs of underserved communities by eliminating the “digital divide,” reducing disparities in opportunity to participate in a technology-based global economy. By sweeping these funds (in addition to more than $800,000 worth of administrative fees charged during FY04), the state is effecting the ability of residents of low-income communities to access technology and telecommunications, harming the very people this program was designed to help. The entire city of Kankakee would qualify for this program, as would Kankakee SD 111 and others throughout the region, which will have limited opportunity to do so if this fund is “swept.”

For these reasons, I’m here to ask you not to rely on budget fixes for which some future generation will have to pay. For our region and the state to be one of the nation’s most prosperous, we must plan for and build a healthy, sustainable economy. I encourage you and your colleagues to consider all feasible, long-lasting options to move Illinois forward. Thank you.

More posts by Kristi

All posts by Kristi »

MPC on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter »


Stay in the loop!

MPC's Regionalist newsletter keeps you up to date with our work and our upcoming events.?

Subscribe to Regionalist


Most popular news

Browse by date »

This page can be found online at http://archive.metroplanning.org/news/3261

Metropolitan Planning Council 140 S. Dearborn St.
Suite 1400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
312 922 5616 info@metroplanning.org

Sign up for newsletter and alerts »

Shaping a better, bolder, more equitable future for everyone

For more than 85 years, the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) has partnered with communities, businesses, and governments to unleash the greatness of the Chicago region. We believe that every neighborhood has promise, every community should be heard, and every person can thrive. To tackle the toughest urban planning and development challenges, we create collaborations that change perceptions, conversations—and the status quo. Read more about our work »

Donate »