Elburn, Illinois: Thinking Inside and Outside the Box - Metropolitan Planning Council

Skip to main content

Elburn, Illinois: Thinking Inside and Outside the Box

ULI Chicago and the Campaign for Sensible Growth advise Elburn how to plan for growth for a transit-oriented development adjacent to a new Metra line extension, and conservation development within "the box" of streams that define the community.

Long-time residents of the farming community of Elburn, Ill., located in western Kane County, have talked about suburban growth reaching their village for decades. But nine miles of undeveloped farmland between their village and St. Charles and other Fox River communities to the east, and Spring Grove and I- 88 to the south, is no longer enough to separate the community from growth pressure. Metra's construction of a new extension line from Geneva is moving at a brisk pace, expected to open by the end of 2005. Two new developments in the community, and far more in surrounding communities, have brought development issues center stage.

On Sept. 29 and 30, the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Chicago and the Campaign for Sensible Growth organized a technical assistance panel for the community.

The panel met with village officials, business and community leaders and intensively worked for the two-day visit to try to answer specific questions posed by the village.

Members of the panel included Gregory Hummel, panel chair and a partner at Bell, Boyd & Lloyd; Robert E. Cowhey, president, Cowhey Gudmundson Leder, Ltd.; Douglas Farr, founding principal and president, Farr Associates Architecture and Urban Design; Stephen B. Friedman; president, S. B. Friedman & Company; David K. Hill, chairman & CEO; Kimball Hill Homes; William Humphrey, Illinois State director, The Conservation Fund; Diane Legge Kemp, principal, DKL Architecture, Inc.; Joyce O'Keefe, assistant director, Openlands Project; Randy Tharp, senior vice president - construction, A. Epstein & Sons International, Inc.; and Nicholas F. Wilder, president, Waveland Partners.

The Village of Elburn representation was led by David Morrison, village administrator and Dr. James L. Willey, mayor, Village of Elburn.

The panel presented its findings to the public on the afternoon of Sept. 30.

The panel divided its presentation into four areas:

Vision

The panel recommended proactively executing the vision of the village in face of accelerating development through boundary agreements, protecting the "emerald necklace," developing a detailed comprehensive plan establishing the town framework and design principles (down to the block level), and using regulatory and financial implementation tools to meet the above objectives.

Countryside conservation development

The panel recommended protecting the emerald necklace by working with the Kane County Forest Preserve District to acquire land and/or easements, retaining 250-foot buffers on both sides of streams that make up "the box," and requiring developers to do their part in the development of new proposals to connect bicycle and pedestrians paths. Key to this is inventorying assets to save and establishing a park district for both land acquisition and programming. Countryside development should maintain the rural feel by creating true parkways along major collectors and along Routes 38 and 47.

A healthy lifestyle can be encouraged by adopting a community-wide bicycle trail plan and all paths should link into a village-wide network. Mixing uses and clustering housing will free up usable open space and density bonuses beyond two units per acre should be considered in exchange for reduced impervious surfaces. Detention ponds (including existing ones) should be naturalized and integrated throughout subdivisions, and landcaping can be improved by adopting landscape and tree ordinances. The village needs to plan its future, including streets and blocks to give developers a vision for how the community develops, from small lots close to the transit-oriented development site, to larger lots on the perimeter of the village.

In-town transit-oriented development

Adjacent to the new Metra station is a large site that is being considered for transit-oriented development. The site must incorporate linkages to the station, downtown, and the larger community and region. A major issue is how to deal with north-south traffic that is currently at a standstill with 80 freight trains per day crossing Route 47. Metra service will only add to the blockages on 47. The panel recommended two different schemes for how to incorporate a new overpass over the train tracks east of 47.

The plan concepts are to have higher densities close to the Metra station, flexible uses to respond to market demand in the station zone, open space (such as a soccer field) between the development and the new overpass that will extend Anderson, and opening the north side as a secondary retail and infill park to link the station to the existing downtown. Building types would include mixed-use with residential and retail; mixed-use with flats over retail; multi-family; duplex; townhomes; and single family. The transit-oriented development "outside the box" ideas would call for moving the planned Anderson Road overpass further east and building it as a context-sensitive boulevard rather than as a typical highway that would bisect the community.

Implementation

There are a range of activities the village would need to move forward on to meet its vision for the future, starting with completing a detailed comprehensive plan/strategy document that would meld physical planning, financing and project management together. Tools that can be used to protect the emerald necklace include purchase and bonds, conservation easements, pre-annexation/annexation agreements, exactions, and incentives/density bonus/transferable development rights. Financing sources include federal, stae and local grants, and partnerships with nonprofit organizations. Financial tools for projects include a financial plan and capital budget, general obligation bonding, alternative revenue bonds, developer exactions, and special service areas. The panel recommended a TIF for the downtown and transit-oriented development site. The panel also listed over a dozen sources for seed money and project financing sources.

A full report with the plans, drawings and detailed recommendations will be made available on this Web site in the future.

For more information, contact Ellen Shubart , Campaign for Sensible Growth Manager, at 312-863-6009.

MPC on Twitter

Follow us on Twitter »


Stay in the loop!

MPC's Regionalist newsletter keeps you up to date with our work and our upcoming events.?

Subscribe to Regionalist


Most popular news

Browse by date »

This page can be found online at http://archive.metroplanning.org/news/3236

Metropolitan Planning Council 140 S. Dearborn St.
Suite 1400
Chicago, Ill. 60603
312 922 5616 info@metroplanning.org

Sign up for newsletter and alerts »

Shaping a better, bolder, more equitable future for everyone

For more than 85 years, the Metropolitan Planning Council (MPC) has partnered with communities, businesses, and governments to unleash the greatness of the Chicago region. We believe that every neighborhood has promise, every community should be heard, and every person can thrive. To tackle the toughest urban planning and development challenges, we create collaborations that change perceptions, conversations—and the status quo. Read more about our work »

Donate »